As Douglas talks about The Joke, he
highlights the idea that humor draws attention to social structures and
relationships. We have often discussed this in class, and I found Douglas’
assertion, that “the joke form rarely lies in the utterance alone, but that it
can be identified in the total situation” (148), particularly apt. This is
something I could not help but experience in my own humorous adventures.
Americans usually find jokes from
different cultures less humorous than jokes from their own soil. I have a
friend from France, and he told me this joke the other day:
A guy walks into a bar and yells, “It’s
me!”
Everyone turns around, but it wasn’t him.
[End.]
When
he was finished, awkwardly waiting to see if I found it as funny as he did, I
could muster only confusion. He rolled his eyes and explained that the “me” in
this situation was subjective, so the people who turned around could have been
expecting any “me.” I kind of
half-smiled and he was satisfied.
Without the larger context of French
as a first language, I was excluded from this joke. It was simply not as funny
to me, because the words required a larger context, about which I was ignorant.
Even after he explained the joke, though, I cannot say that I would pass it on
to my friends, except here as an example of a joke that I’ll never find funny.
The context for a joke is important
even with instances of humor from our own backyard. Though we have often
discussed the highlighting of a larger context through a joke, this reading of
Douglas specifically reminded me of political cartoons. This genre might not always
be side-splittingly, laugh-out-loud humorous, but, as Douglas points out, “one
can appreciate a joke without actually laughing, and one can laugh for other
reasons than from having perceived a joke” (148).
The cartoon below can only be
appreciated if the viewer is informed about Obama and his healthcare policies,
thinks that a smug Obama or a precocious child is laughable, or perhaps simply
gets a kick out of the President being dressed up as the symbol of Christmas
and called “Obama Claus.” Without any of these qualities of the viewer,
however, this cartoon is either offensive, as to one who wholeheartedly
endorses Obama’s healthcare policies, or confusing, as to someone who has none
of the context with which to appreciate it.
Douglas is quite right to point out
the importance of context in humorous situations. Sometimes, the context is
highlighted by the joke, but other times, the context must be a prerequisite to
the understanding of the joke. It seems possible that this kind of humor is
less effective than the former. In Tales
of the Tikongs, for example, any readers are invited to laugh before they
consider the larger ideas represented. Only those that already agree with the
ideas represented in political cartoons can appreciate them and their like.
No comments:
Post a Comment