Mark Twain tells us that when we want to tell a story,
we need to focus on the manner in which we tell it, at least in American humor.
We need to be sincere in our telling of even the most comedic anecdote. Amy
Sedaris brilliantly chooses her content so that when following Twain’s rules
for storytelling, her “sincere” manner will seem all the more humorous to her
audiences.
At the beginning of the book, she writes a little
letter to her readers. She does use a sort of trope in this opening letter,
when she tells us how serious she is
and how truthful she is. In the second paragraph, Sedaris says that the book is
her attempt “to share with you something I take very seriously: entertaining in
my home, my style” (Sedaris) She begins the final paragraph of the letter, “This
is not a joke cookbook. I don’t like joke cookbooks because I can’t take them
seriously. This book is full of real information” (Sedaris). She says this, but
then at one point in the book, she tells us how to make felt peas! We should
also note here, the recurrence of the “it’s all true” tactic. This joke, for
me, was one of the weaker techniques used in the book, partially, I’m sure,
because I have heard it in an abundance of other writing and storytelling
(including her brother David’s work).
Throughout the book, she makes fun of herself, and
people who attend and host parties, but due to the nature of the content, we
are not in a position to be truly offended, and she can freely tease and prod. Note
that the section on entertaining the elderly is in large print. This is a
hilarious marriage of form and content, as she reminds us of all of the
restrictions the elderly have, restrictions which we may one day have. However,
I found the large print particularly funny, because now the elderly can read
all of the mocking, insulting things that she says about them!
Another successful tactic Sedaris uses is that of
truth. Oftentimes, the truth—or at least, a story rooted in truth—is far more
humorous than any fictionalized account. Sedaris is not afraid of pointing out
the feeling that a lot of hosts felt was taboo, or were too embarrassed to talk
about: dreading parties. We’re supposed to be social beings, right? But Amy
Sedaris does not allow us to deny that anxiety many of us feel when hosting. “For
most people the word ‘party’ conjures up an image that is so intimidating, so
overwhelming, so terrifying that they just want to skip the whole thing—it’s
too much pressure” (17). While Amy dramatizes this feeling, she is not wrong
for most people.
In fact, I googled variations on the theme of “fear of
hosting party,” and “frequency of anxiety over hosting party.” Google showed me
an abundance of articles with such titles as: “Overcoming Your Fear of
Houseguests: A Beginner’s Guide to Stress-Free Hosting,” “Dinner Party Barriers
and Why We Don’t Do It,” and “Overcoming Party-Hosting Anxiety: Experience Life.”
These titles too, sound so dramatic. We laugh most likely because of the
incongruity theory combined with the relief theory. We are terribly nervous
about this specific kind of social interaction, and Sedaris gives us a specific
outlet for this release. The incongruity comes into play because it is so
absurd that we fear this simple social thing. Sedaris also makes us laugh via
the incongruity theory when she tells us that a good idea for entertaining the
elderly is to “toss a balloon back and forth,” or shows us how to make felt
peas, but does not explain why they are useful (Sedaris 149).
Her humor works because she picked a relatable, but
still typically light topic. This way, her seriousness in writing tone
(especially juxtaposed with the pictures) makes us laugh, and she is able to
make jokes and jabs at herself and people in general without offending anyone.
While she does not bring up a huge social issue, she may cause us to think
about why we fear something so absurdly rooted in our nature as a social
gathering, and how we may fear these less or help each other to feel more
comfortable.
No comments:
Post a Comment